Saturday, November 3, 2007

Judge approves Frey book settlement

NEW YORK - About 1,700 people asked to be reimbursed for buying James Frey's largely fabricated best-selling memoir, "A Million Little Pieces," a lawyer said Friday as a judge approved a settlement with disgruntled readers
U.S. District Judge Richard J. Holwell said the settlement was "most fair, adequate and reasonable." It offered a refund to anyone who bought the book before Frey's falsehoods were acknowledged.

Although the book was a best seller that exploded in sales after Oprah Winfrey chose it for her book club, only 1,729 readers came forward to benefit from the settlement, said Larry D. Drury, a Chicago lawyer for the plaintiffs.

In January 2006, the Web site The Smoking Gun revealed that Frey's memoir of addiction and recovery contained numerous fabrications. Frey and his publisher then acknowledged that he had made up parts of the book.

Although Random House set aside $2.35 million in a fund to cover costs related to the lawsuits, advertisements in 962 newspapers and elsewhere drew only the 1,729 claims for reimbursement by the deadline, costing just $27,348.

Another $783,000 will be paid out in legal fees along with $432,000 in costs associated with publicizing and carrying out the settlement.

The settlement also calls for roughly $180,000 to be divided among three charities: First Book, a nonprofit that gives children from low-income families a chance to read and own their first book; Hazelden addiction treatment center and the American Red Cross.

As part of the deal, Random House agreed to include a warning in the book that not all portions of the book may be accurate. In addition, an author's note about the subject was to be included in copies of the book until this December.

Drury noted that 93,738 copies of the book were sold in the seven months after the controversy erupted.

"Amazingly, the book remained a best seller for another 26 weeks," he told Holwell.

Drury said Frey had received more than $4.4 million in royalties.

The defendants' lawyers declined to comment.

Outside court, Drury said the message of the case was that "corporations need to be held accountable for their conduct."

Evan Smith, another lawyer for the plaintiffs, said: "I also think publishers will think twice before labeling their book a memoir."


Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home